Here's the payload and weight comparison between the two ArmorBionic utility cognitive AMRs:
| Model | Payload class | Weight | Dimensions (W×H×L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NONI 300 | 300 kg | 120 kg | 700 × 350 × 1000 mm |
| NONI 500 | 500 kg | 160 kg | 700 × 350 × 1000 mm |
Summary:
- The NONI 500 carries 200 kg more payload (500 kg vs 300 kg class) at the cost of 40 kg more robot weight (160 kg vs 120 kg). armorbioni... +3armorbionic.io ↗“robot.payload_kg=300 kg”armorbionic.io ↗“mechanical.weight_g=120000 g”armorbionic.io ↗“robot.payload_kg=500 kg”armorbionic.io ↗“mechanical.weight_g=160000 g”
- Both share the same footprint (700 × 350 × 1000 mm), the same differential-drive 4iWD locomotion, 2 m/s max speed, IP44 rating, and the same Jetson Orin NX 16GB edge AI module with FALCON VISION navigation. armorbioni... +7armorbionic.io ↗“Differential drive - 4iWD”armorbionic.io ↗“robot.max_speed_m_s=2”armorbionic.io ↗“mechanical.ip_rating=IP44”armorbionic.io ↗“Jetson Orin NX 16GB edge AI”armorbionic.io ↗“Differential drive - 4iWD”armorbionic.io ↗“robot.max_speed_m_s=2”armorbionic.io ↗“mechanical.ip_rating=IP44”armorbionic.io ↗“Jetson Orin NX 16GB edge AI”
So the choice between them is purely about payload capacity — the NONI 500 is the heavier-duty option for heavier intralogistics loads, while everything else (navigation, drive, speed, form factor) is identical.