Here's the comparison of the two ADLINK NEON-2000 starter kits on the three attributes you asked about:
| Attribute | NEON-2000-JNO Series Starter Kit | NEON-2000-ONO Series Starter Kit |
|---|---|---|
| Lifecycle status | EOL (end of life) | Active |
| Onboard storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Jetson module | Jetson Nano family (not listed at module level) | Jetson Orin Nano 4GB |
Key takeaways:
- The NEON-2000-JNO kit is EOL (it's a Jetson Nano-based developer kit, supporting JetPack 4.6.1), while the NEON-2000-ONO kit is Active, based on the Jetson Orin Nano 4GB module. adlinktech... +3adlinktech.com ↗“identity.lifecycle_status=EOL”adlinktech.com ↗“identity.lifecycle_status=Active”adlinktech.com ↗“ADLINK developer kit for Jetson Nano”adlinktech.com ↗“Jetson Orin Nano 4GB”
- Onboard storage is 4x larger on the ONO kit (128 GB vs. 32 GB). adlinktech... +1adlinktech.com ↗“storage.onboard_storage_gb=32 GB”adlinktech.com ↗“storage.onboard_storage_gb=128 GB”
- The catalog lists the ONO kit's module as Jetson Orin Nano 4GB (20 INT8 TOPS, sparse, Base). For the JNO kit, the catalog only states the supported family (Jetson Nano); a specific module model is not listed. adlinktech... +2adlinktech.com ↗“compatibility.jetson_module=Jetson Orin Nano 4GB”adlinktech.com ↗“20 INT8 TOPS (sparse, Base)”adlinktech.com ↗“compatibility.supported_jetson_families=Jetson Nano”
If you're choosing between the two for a new project, the ONO kit is the current-generation option — the JNO kit is end-of-life.