Here's the comparison of the two JWIPC EII series edge AI box PCs:
EII-6300E vs EII-6200E
| Spec | EII-6300E | EII-6200E |
|---|---|---|
| AI performance | 1035 TOPS (INT8) | 275 TOPS (INT8) |
| FP32 performance | 8.064 TFLOPS | 5.3 TFLOPS |
| FP4 performance | 2070 TFLOPS | Not listed in the catalog |
| Memory | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Serial (COM) ports | 3 | 4 |
Notes on the numbers:
- Both products' TOPS figures are INT8; the Jetson Thor–based EII-6300E reports sparse INT8, while the AGX Orin–based EII-6200E's figure is dense INT8 — so the raw numbers aren't directly comparable on the same basis. jwipc.com +1jwipc.com ↗“Industrial edge AI box on Jetson Thor”jwipc.com ↗“up to 275 TOPS”
- The EII-6300E also carries 2070 TFLOPS FP4, a precision specific to the Thor generation; it should not be compared against the INT8 TOPS figures. jwipc.comjwipc.com ↗“max_fp4_tflops=2070 TFLOPS”
- The FP32 figures (8.064 and 5.3 TFLOPS) are based on the Jetson module inside each system — Jetson Thor and Jetson AGX Orin respectively. jwipc.com +1jwipc.com ↗“max_fp32_tflops=8.064 TFLOPS”jwipc.com ↗“max_fp32_tflops=5.3 TFLOPS”
Bottom line: the EII-6300E (Jetson Thor) delivers substantially more AI compute and twice the memory, while the EII-6200E (Jetson AGX Orin) actually has one more serial COM port (4 vs 3). If you need many serial devices beyond COM ports, both also have CAN buses — 4 CAN ports on the 6300E vs 2 on the 6200E — which may matter for your connectivity planning. jwipc.com +3jwipc.com ↗“io.serial_port_count=3”jwipc.com ↗“io.serial_port_count=4”jwipc.com ↗“io.can_port_count=4”jwipc.com ↗“io.can_port_count=2”