Here's the comparison of the three attributes you asked about, both from Neousys' Embedded AI Systems group:
| Attribute | FLYC-300 | NRU-154PoE-FT |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 345 g | 1000 g |
| Power input | 12–60 V (wide-range DC) | 12 V only |
| Ethernet ports | 2 | 5 (4 of them PoE, 802.3at, 50 W total budget) |
Key differences:
- Weight: The FLYC-300 is roughly one-third the weight of the NRU-154PoE-FT (345 g vs 1000 g), consistent with its drone-computer positioning. neousys-te... +1neousys-tech.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=345 g”neousys-tech.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=1000 g”
- Power input: The FLYC-300 accepts a wide 12–60 V input range, while the NRU-154PoE-FT is specified for 12 V input only. neousys-te... +1neousys-tech.com ↗“power.power_input=12-60 V”neousys-tech.com ↗“power.power_input=12-12 V”
- Ethernet: The NRU-154PoE-FT offers 5 Ethernet ports with 4 supporting PoE (802.3at, 50 W total PoE budget), versus 2 Ethernet ports on the FLYC-300. Both support up to 2.5GbE. neousys-te... +3neousys-tech.com ↗“io.ethernet_ports=2”neousys-tech.com ↗“io.ethernet_ports=5, io.poe_port_count=4”neousys-tech.com ↗“power.poe_total_budget_w=50 W”neousys-tech.com ↗“io.max_ethernet_speed=2.5GbE”
Both systems run on Jetson Orin NX modules with 100 TOPS INT8 (sparse) AI performance. neousys-te... +1neousys-tech.com ↗“performance.max_ai_tops=100 TOPS”neousys-tech.com ↗“performance.max_ai_tops=100 TOPS”