For a PoE camera node, how do the D115W and D131 compare on PoE ports, CAN ports and max operating temperature?

Question

Rapidflare · Accepted Answer

Here's how the AVerMedia D115W and D131 compare on the attributes you asked about:

| Attribute | D115W | D131 |
|---|---|---|
| PoE ports | 1 | 1 |
| CAN ports | 1 | 1 |
| Max operating temperature | 85 °C | 70 °C |

- **PoE ports:** Both boards have exactly 1 PoE port, so a single-camera PoE node works identically on either. If your node needs more than one PoE camera, neither board alone covers it. The D115W does have 2 Ethernet ports total (1 PoE + 1 standard) versus 1 on the D131, which could matter for adding a non-PoE camera or uplink.
- **CAN ports:** Both have 1 CAN port, so a CAN connection (e.g. to a vehicle bus or PTZ controller) is equivalent on both.
- **Max operating temperature:** This is the real differentiator. The D115W is rated up to 85 °C (and down to −40 °C), while the D131 tops out at 70 °C (from 0 °C). If your camera node sits outdoors or in an enclosure with limited airflow, the D115W gives you noticeably more thermal headroom. Note the D131's temperature range comes with a listed condition — it depends on PoE load.

**Bottom line:** For a PoE camera node, the two boards are equivalent on PoE and CAN port counts; the D115W's wider temperature range (up to 85 °C) makes it the safer pick for harsh environments, while the D131 suffices for indoor or climate-controlled deployments.

AVerMedia D115W vs D131: PoE ports, CAN ports and max operating temperature

Sources