Here is the comparison on the three attributes you asked about, from the catalog:
| Attribute | APEX THOR | MIIVII APEX DUAL ORIN en.miivii... +1en.miivii.com ↗“APEX THOR”en.miivii.com ↗“MIIVII APEX DUAL ORIN” |
|---|---|---|
| AI performance (max) | 1035 TOPS (INT8, sparse) | 550 TOPS |
| CAN ports | 4 | 12 |
| Weight | 4300 g | 10000 g |
Key takeaways for a robotaxi compute stack:
- AI throughput: The APEX THOR delivers roughly twice the AI TOPS — 1035 TOPS (INT8, sparse, Jetson T5000-based) versus 550 TOPS for the APEX DUAL ORIN (dual Jetson AGX Orin). en.miivii... +1en.miivii.com ↗“performance.max_ai_tops=1035 TOPS”en.miivii.com ↗“performance.max_ai_tops=550 TOPS”
- CAN connectivity: The APEX DUAL ORIN offers significantly more CAN ports — 12 vs 4 — useful if you're interfacing with a large number of vehicle CAN bus segments. It also includes an Infineon TC397 safety MCU. en.miivii... +2en.miivii.com ↗“io.can_port_count=12”en.miivii.com ↗“io.can_port_count=4”en.miivii.com ↗“Infineon TC397 safety MCU”
- Weight: The APEX THOR is less than half the weight — 4300 g vs 10000 g — and it is also more compact (240 × 71 × 173 mm vs 240 × 93 × 370 mm). en.miivii... +2en.miivii.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=4300 g”en.miivii.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=10000 g”en.miivii.com ↗“370”
A few related notes that may matter for the same decision: the APEX THOR supports 12 GMSL2 camera inputs and is IP65-rated, while the APEX DUAL ORIN supports 16 GMSL2 inputs; both accept 9–36 V wide input and share the same -25 °C to 70 °C operating temperature range and 5G cellular support. en.miivii... +5en.miivii.com ↗“io.gmsl_camera_inputs=12”en.miivii.com ↗“io.gmsl_camera_inputs=16”en.miivii.com ↗“mechanical.ip_rating=IP65”en.miivii.com ↗“power.power_input=9-36 V”en.miivii.com ↗“thermal.max_operating_temp_c=70 °C”en.miivii.com ↗“connectivity.cellular=5G”