Here's how the two FRAMOS sensor modules compare on the attributes you asked about:
| Attribute | FSM-IMX334C-000-V1A | FSM-IMX585C-000-V1A |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel pitch | 2 µm × 2 µm | 2.9 µm × 2.9 µm |
| Native data interface | MIPI CSI-2 (4 Lane) | MIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane) |
| Pixel bit depths | 10 bit, 12 bit | 10 bit, 12 bit |
Summary of the differences:
- Pixel pitch is the biggest differentiator: the FSM-IMX585C uses larger 2.9 µm pixels versus 2 µm on the FSM-IMX334C. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“2.9}”framos.com ↗“2}”
- Native data interface: both are MIPI CSI-2, but the IMX585C module supports a 2- or 4-lane configuration, while the IMX334C module is specified at 4 lanes. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“native_data_interface=MIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane)”framos.com ↗“native_data_interface=MIPI CSI-2 (4 Lane)”
- Pixel bit depths: identical — both modules support 10-bit and 12-bit output. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“sensor_module.pixel_bit_depths=10 bit, 12 bit”framos.com ↗“sensor_module.pixel_bit_depths=10 bit, 12 bit”
If it's useful, the catalog also lists the FSM-IMX585C's resolution as 3856 × 2180 pixels; no comparable resolution value is listed in the catalog for the FSM-IMX334C. framos.comframos.com ↗“2180}”