select.parts
Comparison

FRAMOS FSM-IMX334C-000-V1A vs FSM-IMX585C-000-V1A: pixel pitch, data interface and bit depths

Asked as: “How do the FRAMOS FSM-IMX334C-000-V1A and FSM-IMX585C-000-V1A compare on pixel pitch, native data interface and supported pixel bit depths?”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

Here's how the two FRAMOS sensor modules compare on the attributes you asked about:

AttributeFSM-IMX334C-000-V1AFSM-IMX585C-000-V1A
Pixel pitch2 µm × 2 µm2.9 µm × 2.9 µm
Native data interfaceMIPI CSI-2 (4 Lane)MIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane)
Pixel bit depths10 bit, 12 bit10 bit, 12 bit

Summary of the differences:

  • Pixel pitch is the biggest differentiator: the FSM-IMX585C uses larger 2.9 µm pixels versus 2 µm on the FSM-IMX334C. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“2.9}”framos.com ↗“2}”
  • Native data interface: both are MIPI CSI-2, but the IMX585C module supports a 2- or 4-lane configuration, while the IMX334C module is specified at 4 lanes. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“native_data_interface=MIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane)”framos.com ↗“native_data_interface=MIPI CSI-2 (4 Lane)”
  • Pixel bit depths: identical — both modules support 10-bit and 12-bit output. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“sensor_module.pixel_bit_depths=10 bit, 12 bit”framos.com ↗“sensor_module.pixel_bit_depths=10 bit, 12 bit”

If it's useful, the catalog also lists the FSM-IMX585C's resolution as 3856 × 2180 pixels; no comparable resolution value is listed in the catalog for the FSM-IMX334C. framos.comframos.com ↗“2180}”

Sources

  1. FSM-IMX585C-000-V1A framos.com
  2. FSM-IMX334C-000-V1A framos.com