Here's how the two LIPSedge ToF cameras compare on those three specs:
| Spec | LIPSedge DL | LIPSedge DL400 |
|---|---|---|
| Depth output resolution | 640×480 (default output; 320×240 native) | 320×240 (native QVGA) |
| RGB output resolution | 1920×1080 | 2592×1944 |
| RGB max frame rate | 30 fps | 10 fps |
Depth resolution. The DL outputs depth at 640×480 by default (its native sensor depth is 320×240), while the DL400's native QVGA depth output is 320×240. Both share the same 30 fps maximum depth frame rate. lips-hci.com +1lips-hci.com ↗“640x480@30 defaultdepth output,320x240@30 native depth”lips-hci.com ↗“NativeQVGA@30 isexplicitly320x240@30”
RGB resolution. The DL400's maximum RGB output is 2592×1944, notably higher than the DL's 1920×1080 maximum. lips-hci.com +1lips-hci.com ↗“RGB1920x1080@30 maximumoutput”lips-hci.com ↗“Maximum RGB output2592x1944@10fps”
RGB frame rate. The trade-off: the DL400 tops out at 10 fps for RGB, whereas the DL reaches 30 fps at its 1080p maximum. lips-hci.com +1lips-hci.com ↗“camera.max_image_output_resolution_frame_rate_fps=30 fps”lips-hci.com ↗“camera.max_image_output_resolution_frame_rate_fps=10 fps”
In short: choose the DL for higher depth resolution and faster RGB; choose the DL400 when you need higher-resolution still RGB capture and can work with QVGA depth at 10 fps RGB.