select.parts
Comparison

WOLF-16T1 vs WOLF-16T9 on fastest Ethernet, weight and cooling

Asked as: “How do the WOLF-16T1 (VPX3U-THOR-SBC) and WOLF-16T9 (VPX3U-THOR-RD) compare on fastest Ethernet, weight and cooling?”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

Here's how the two WOLF Advanced Technology IGX Thor 3U VPX boards compare on the three attributes you asked about:

WOLF-16T1 vs WOLF-16T9 Comparison

AttributeWOLF-16T1 (VPX3U-THOR-SBC)WOLF-16T9 (VPX3U-THOR-RD)
Fastest Ethernet25GbE10GbE
Weight1500 g1000 g
CoolingConductionConduction

Ethernet: The WOLF-16T1 is faster, supporting up to 25GbE Ethernet , while the WOLF-16T9 tops out at 10GbE — the RD variant's description specifically calls out dual 10GBASE-KR . wolfadvanc... +2wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“io.max_ethernet_speed=25GbE”wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“io.max_ethernet_speed=10GbE”wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“dual 10GBASE-KR”

Weight: The WOLF-16T9 is lighter at 1000 g versus 1500 g for the WOLF-16T1 . wolfadvanc... +1wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=1000 g”wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=1500 g”

Cooling: Both boards use conduction cooling and share the same operating temperature range of -40 °C to 70 °C . wolfadvanc... +3wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“thermal.cooling=Conduction”wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“thermal.cooling=Conduction”wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“thermal.min_operating_temp_c=-40”wolfadvancedtechnology.com ↗“thermal.max_operating_temp_c=70”

In short: the WOLF-16T1 offers the faster Ethernet (25GbE vs 10GbE) but is 500 g heavier; the two are identical on conduction cooling. Note that the 10GbE figure for the WOLF-16T9 aligns with its rapid-development focus (PCIe Gen5 x4, 60–140 W power range), while the WOLF-16T1 targets safety-certifiable deployments with its ISO 26262 PCIe Gen4 switch and TSN Ethernet.

Sources

  1. WOLF-16T1 (VPX3U-THOR-SBC) wolfadvancedtechnology.com
  2. WOLF-16T9 (VPX3U-THOR-RD) wolfadvancedtechnology.com