select.parts
Comparison

MIC-741-AT vs MIC-742-AT on Ethernet ports, weight and mounting options

Asked as: “MIC-741-AT vs MIC-742-AT on Ethernet ports, weight and mounting options?”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

Here's the side-by-side comparison of the two Advantech Edge AI Box PCs on the attributes you asked about:

AttributeMIC-741-ATMIC-742-AT
Ethernet ports4 (up to 25GbE)1 (up to 25GbE)
Weight4420 g3000 g
Mounting optionsDesktop, Wall mountWall mount, DIN rail

Key differences:

  • Ethernet: The MIC-741-AT offers 4 Ethernet ports versus 1 on the MIC-742-AT; both support up to 25GbE. Note that the MIC-742-AT also has 1 SFP port, which the MIC-741-AT does not list. advantech... +1advantech.com ↗“io.ethernet_ports=4, io.max_ethernet_speed=25GbE”advantech.com ↗“io.ethernet_ports=1, io.sfp_ports=1, io.max_ethernet_speed=25GbE”
  • Weight: The MIC-742-AT is the lighter unit at 3000 g, while the MIC-741-AT weighs 4420 g. advantech... +1advantech.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=4420 g”advantech.com ↗“mechanical.weight_g=3000 g”
  • Mounting: The MIC-741-AT supports desktop and wall-mount installation; the MIC-742-AT supports wall-mount and DIN-rail installation. advantech... +1advantech.com ↗“mechanical.mounting_type=Desktop, Wall mount”advantech.com ↗“mechanical.mounting_type=Wall mount, DIN rail”

So if you need multiple Ethernet connections and desktop placement, the MIC-741-AT fits better; if you need a lighter unit for DIN-rail deployment, the MIC-742-AT is the better match.

Sources

  1. MIC-741-AT advantech.com
  2. MIC-742-AT advantech.com