select.parts
Comparison

NileCAM130_CUOAGX vs e-CAM130_CUOAGX: interface, resolution and Jetson families

Asked as: “NileCAM130_CUOAGX vs e-CAM130_CUOAGX: interface, resolution and supported Jetson families?”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

Here's the comparison of the two e-con Systems camera kits across the attributes you asked about:

ProductInterfaceResolution (pixels)Supported Jetson families
NileCAM130_CUOAGXGMSL24208 × 3120Jetson AGX Orin, Jetson AGX Xavier
e-CAM130_CUOAGXMIPI CSI-24192 × 3120Jetson AGX Orin, Jetson Thor, Jetson AGX Xavier

Key differences:

  • Interface: The NileCAM130_CUOAGX connects over GMSL2, while the e-CAM130_CUOAGX uses MIPI CSI-2. e-consyste... +1e-consystems.com ↗“camera.interface=GMSL2”e-consystems.com ↗“camera.interface=MIPI CSI-2”
  • Resolution: Both are 13 MP-class rolling-shutter cameras built on the same AR1335 sensor with Electronic Rolling Shutter; the NileCAM130_CUOAGX is listed at 4208 × 3120 and the e-CAM130_CUOAGX at 4192 × 3120. - Jetson support: Both support Jetson AGX Orin and Jetson AGX Xavier, but only the e-CAM130_CUOAGX additionally lists support for Jetson Thor — relevant if you plan to move to the Thor platform. e-consyste... +1e-consystems.com ↗“compatibility.supported_jetson_families=Jetson AGX Orin, Jetson AGX Xavier”e-consystems.com ↗“compatibility.supported_jetson_families=Jetson AGX Orin, Jetson Thor, Jetson AGX Xavier” e-consyste... +1e-consystems.com ↗“3120}”e-consystems.com ↗“3120}”

Product pages for reference: NileCAM130_CUOAGX and e-CAM130_CUOAGX.

Sources

  1. NileCAM130_CUOAGX e-consystems.com
  2. e-CAM130_CUOAGX e-consystems.com