Here's the comparison of the two NexCOBOT MARS400 platforms on the three attributes you asked about:
| Attribute | MARS400 A10-04-C | MARS400 T20-05 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| GMSL camera inputs | 8 | 8 |
| CAN ports | 2 | 2 |
Summary:
- Memory: The T20-05 doubles the memory capacity with 128 GB versus 64 GB on the A10-04-C. nexcobot.com +1nexcobot.com ↗“memory.memory_gb=64 GB”nexcobot.com ↗“memory.memory_gb=128 GB”
- GMSL camera inputs: Both platforms provide 8 GMSL camera inputs, so camera connectivity is identical here. nexcobot.com +1nexcobot.com ↗“io.gmsl_camera_inputs=8”nexcobot.com ↗“io.gmsl_camera_inputs=8”
- CAN ports: Both platforms offer 2 CAN ports. nexcobot.com +1nexcobot.com ↗“io.can_port_count=2”nexcobot.com ↗“io.can_port_count=2”
For context on their compute base: the A10-04-C is powered by the NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64GB module, while the T20-05 is built around the NVIDIA IGX T5000 128GB module. nexcobot.com +1nexcobot.com ↗“compatibility.jetson_module=Jetson AGX Orin 64GB”nexcobot.com ↗“compatibility.jetson_module=IGX T5000 128GB”
So if memory headroom is the deciding factor, the T20-05 is the stronger option; on GMSL inputs and CAN ports they are equal.