Here's the comparison you asked for, based on the catalog specs for the two Tauro Technologies TT310 variants:
| Spec | TT310 AGX Orin | TT310 AGX Thor |
|---|---|---|
| AI performance (max) | 275 INT8 TOPS (sparse) | 1035 FP8 TOPS (sparse) |
| Max power consumption budget | 330 W | 330 W |
| Operating temperature range | -10 °C to 60 °C | -10 °C to 60 °C |
taurotech... +5taurotech.com ↗“275 INT8 TOPS (sparse)”taurotech.com ↗“1035 FP8 TOPS (sparse)”taurotech.com ↗“power.total_power_budget_w=330 W”taurotech.com ↗“power.total_power_budget_w=330 W”taurotech.com ↗“thermal.max_operating_temp_c=60 °C, thermal.min_operating_temp_c=-10 °C”taurotech.com ↗“thermal.max_operating_temp_c=60 °C, thermal.min_operating_temp_c=-10 °C”
A few notes on interpretation:
-
AI TOPS are not directly comparable across the two. The AGX Orin variant's figure is INT8 (sparse), while the AGX Thor variant's is FP8 (sparse) — the catalog descriptions label them as such. Since these are different precisions, treat the 1035 TOPS figure as the Thor product's stated AI performance rather than a strict multiple of the Orin's 275 TOPS.
-
Both share the same 330 W total power budget (with 18–36 V DC input), the same -10 °C to 60 °C operating range, and are otherwise identical platforms (fanless, IP67, 5x Ethernet with 4x PoE, 2x CAN, 5G).
-
The Orin variant supports the Jetson AGX Orin 32GB / 64GB modules, while the Thor variant is built around the Jetson T5000 128GB module.
-
Product pages: TT310 AGX Orin and TT310 AGX Thor.