select.parts
Comparison

Neousys NRU-162S-AWP vs NRU-172S-PPC for an outdoor pole: weight, max temperature and PoE ports

Asked as: “NRU-162S-AWP vs NRU-172S-PPC for an outdoor pole: weight, max operating temp and PoE port count?”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

Both are Neousys IP66 fanless Jetson Orin systems suited for outdoor mounting, and on the two specs you asked about they differ mainly in weight and thermal headroom:

SpecNRU-162S-AWPNRU-172S-PPC
Weight3,000 g3,800 g
Max operating temp70 °C60 °C
PoE port count4 (802.3at, 50 W total budget)4 (802.3at, 50 W total budget)
Min operating temp−25 °C−25 °C
IP rating / coolingIP66, fanlessIP66, fanless

Key takeaways for an outdoor pole:

  • PoE is identical — both carry 4 PoE ports, 802.3at class, with a 50 W total PoE budget, so camera/IP-device power budget won't differentiate them.
  • NRU-162S-AWP is lighter (3,000 g vs 3,800 g) and tolerates more heat (70 °C vs 60 °C), which can matter for a sun-exposed pole enclosure. Note both units' temperature range depends on power mode and installed peripherals.
  • Both share the same compute (Jetson Orin NX/Nano family, 100 TOPS INT8 sparse base, 1.88 TFLOPS FP32), 5× 1GbE ports, MIL-STD-810H shock/vibration ratings, 5G/Wi-Fi/BT/GNSS connectivity, and EN 50155 / EN 50121-3 compliance.

If the deciding factor is a fanless unit under direct sun or in a hotter climate, the NRU-162S-AWP's 70 °C rating and lower weight give it an edge; the NRU-172S-PPC is a panel-PC form factor (257 × 176 × 65 mm) versus the AWP's slimmer 225 × 55 × 136 mm wall/VESA-mount box.

Sources: NRU-162S-AWP product page, NRU-172S-PPC product page