Orin Nano NVRs: how do the NEXCOM ATC 3563-NA8C/NAA8CR and Advantech MIC-712P-ON compare on PoE ports, USB ports and max operating temperature?

Question

Rapidflare · Accepted Answer

Here's how the two Orin Nano NVRs compare on those three attributes:

**Comparison: NEXCOM ATC 3563-NA8C/NAA8CR vs. Advantech MIC-712P-ON**

| Attribute | NEXCOM ATC 3563-NA8C/NAA8CR | Advantech MIC-712P-ON |
|---|---|---|
| PoE ports | 8x GbE PoE+ (120 W total budget) | 6x GbE PoE (150 W total budget)  |
| USB ports | 3 | 6 total — 4x USB 3.2 plus separate debug and OTG microUSB connectors  |
| Max operating temp | 60 °C (–25 °C to 60 °C; fanless, depends on power mode) | 70 °C (–25 °C to 70 °C; fanless, requires airflow)  |

Summary of the trade-offs:

- **Camera connectivity:** the NEXCOM has more PoE ports (8 vs. 6), but the Advantech has a larger total PoE power budget (150 W vs. 120 W), so per-port usable power favors the Advantech. Note the NEXCOM's ports are PoE+ (802.3af/at) available with RJ45 or M12 connectors — the M12 option suits in-vehicle/railway deployments.
- **USB peripherals:** the Advantech offers twice the USB connectivity (6 vs. 3 ports).
- **Thermal headroom:** the Advantech is rated 10 °C higher (70 °C vs. 60 °C), though its range is stated to require airflow, while the NEXCOM's range depends on the power mode.

Both are fanless Edge AI Box PCs built on the Jetson Orin Nano 8GB (67 TOPS in Super mode), so the module-level AI performance is identical; the differences are purely in I/O and thermal packaging.

NEXCOM ATC 3563-NA8C/NAA8CR vs Advantech MIC-712P-ON: PoE ports, USB ports and max operating temp

Sources

Attribute	NEXCOM ATC 3563-NA8C/NAA8CR	Advantech MIC-712P-ON
PoE ports	8x GbE PoE+ (120 W total budget)	6x GbE PoE (150 W total budget) nexcom.com +1
USB ports	3	6 total — 4x USB 3.2 plus separate debug and OTG microUSB connectors nexcom.com +1
Max operating temp	60 °C (–25 °C to 60 °C; fanless, depends on power mode)	70 °C (–25 °C to 70 °C; fanless, requires airflow) nexcom.com +3